Where is abortion legal and illegal

View by category Prohibited Altogether i. To Save the Woman's Life i. To Preserve Health i. Broad Social or Economic Grounds i.

On Request Gestational Limits Vary i. Filter current view Open Indicators. MH Law explicitly includes mental health. R Permitted in cases of rape. I Permitted in cases of incest. F Permitted in cases of fetal impairment.

SA Spousal authorization required. SX Sex-selective abortion prohibited. Law Unclear. Close Map detail tray. View data.

Reset map Zoom out. Mapping the Trends See Accelerating Progress. Stay Informed Sign up for emails. The law is on hold pending a legal challenge by Planned Parenthood. TENNESSEE - The state passed a sweeping measure in , which included banning abortion as early as six weeks, and requiring patients to be told about a possibility of reversing medication abortions, which is disputed by many medical experts.

Most of the law has been blocked due to a legal challenge. However, a provision banning abortions based on a Down's syndrome diagnosis is in effect. OHIO - A federal appeals court ruled in April that Ohio can enforce a law banning abortions when medical tests show that a fetus has Down's syndrome. Ohio also approved a bill last year requiring fetal tissue be cremated or buried.

The ban was signed into law, but struck down by a court in Abortion rights advocates say it would effectively outlaw abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. IDAHO — The state's governor in April signed a "trigger law" that would ban most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and would go into effect 30 days after any U.

They have filed an appeal with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. This article was updated on Oct 7 with developments in Texas and Montana and Mississippi. What is Roe v Wade, and could a new case overturn US abortion rights? Abortion rights hotspots in as Argentina grants approval. Biden to end Trump-era anti-abortion "global gag rule". Reporting by Emma Batha. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers the lives of people around the world who struggle to live freely or fairly.

This bounty hunter scheme was designed to thwart judicial intervention to protect abortion access before the law could take effect, and it has succeeded in that objective. Although a federal district court scheduled a hearing to consider whether the law should be enjoined, the Fifth Circuit intervened before the hearing took place and concluded that the law could go into effect. Certain state legislatures have stood out this year as particularly hostile to abortion care.

Arkansas has enacted 10 restrictive abortion bills so far in Of the new restrictions enacted this year, 12 fall under the category of an abortion ban, including near-total bans, trigger bans, reason bans, and gestational bans. Additional broadly restrictive bills enacted this year include trigger bans passed in Oklahoma and Texas that would ban abortion if Roe is overturned or gutted, 24 joining 10 other states that have already passed such bans.

The coronavirus pandemic showed the importance of telehealth in expanding access to health care and ensuring continuity of care, as well as the critical role of medication abortion in expanding safe options for abortion.

Yet while many states acted to expand access to telehealth, some explicitly excluded abortion from their expansions and enacted further restrictions on medication abortion. Arizona, Indiana, Montana, Ohio, and Oklahoma all enacted laws requiring medication abortion care to be provided in person, thereby banning telemedicine for abortion care. In a year when policymakers have a particular responsibility to act to protect and expand access to quality, comprehensive health care, many have done just the opposite.

If the Supreme Court undermines abortion rights in Dobbs v. These impacts would disproportionately harm people of color, people with low incomes, young people, people with disabilities, transgender and nonbinary people, immigrants, and people living in the South and Midwest. The law at issue is a ban. Relying on courts is insufficient protection, and proactive action is necessary to stop the harms of these state laws and safeguard and expand access to abortion care.

In the midst of this onslaught of bans and restrictions, some states have taken important steps to advance legislation that protects and expands access to abortion care:. In addition to expanding providers, states have also acted to expand insurance coverage for abortion and undo restrictions on coverage:.

That act expanded who can perform abortions and eliminated onerous and medically unnecessary restrictions, including a mandatory hour waiting period, forced ultrasounds, mandatory biased counseling, and a requirement for abortion providers to meet unnecessary building requirements. For example, in some states where abortion is recognized as essential health care, some providers are already experiencing an influx of patients as a result of the six-week ban in Texas.

The more proactive measures that states can take to increase access, the better able they will be to serve people seeking abortion care both locally and from across state lines. Ultimately, the continued state-level legislative efforts this year to erode abortion rights and rising threats in the courts make clear the need for a proactive abortion agenda at the federal and state level that moves beyond reliance on the judiciary and ensures meaningful access to abortion care for all.

Policymakers must continue to support and follow the lead of activists, organizers, and advocates on the ground who are working to ensure true access to abortion care and build a society that values and recognizes abortion as essential health care. Jamille Fields Allsbrook , Sarah Coombs.

Colin Seeberger Director, Media Relations. Peter Gordon Director, Government Affairs. Madeline Shepherd Director, Government Affairs. Landscape and implications of state abortion restrictions Abortion is essential health care, critical to health equity, reproductive autonomy, and racial, gender, and economic justice; it also helps ensure that people can control their own bodies, lives, and futures. Bans and restrictions to constrict or eliminate abortion access Amid the COVID pandemic, which presented the greatest public health threat in generations and exposed long-present systemic inequities in the U.